'Racial Profiling within America’s Criminal Justice System Essay\r'

'The bulge honor justice system of America is deeply pit with racial bow. Crimes argon beness committed and, in turn, ar resulting with innocent mickle doing hard-time. Thankfully, new put in methods of harmonic court rulings are finding justice for these minorities; however, the results are as shocking as the crimes organism committed. When it was found that the majority of successful orisons were of minorities, the true defects of the system was apparent. The nonage community is being critic everyy judged for things they’re non doing.\r\nThroughout the go bad decade lawmakers have be aiding the racial write scene. Arizona legislature passed a law allowing for an officer to demand papers of whatsoever person that proved their legal citizenship. The law, intending to lower the vile immigrants in Arizona, became a symbol for racial profiling within our government. President Obama strongly opposed the divergence of the law saying that it threatened â€Å"to inframine staple fiber notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as swell as the trust between police and our communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe” (Archibold).\r\nIt is a very rare occasion where the President speaks out some state legislature, proving the enormity of the law and its regards to benevolent rights in America. The law, dubbed the â€Å"Show Me Your Papers” law, has Arizona residents furious. Faulting psyche of being illegal, purely found on their mien is a very subjective issue. Someone with a last name of Garcia or Rodriquez is much to a greater extent(prenominal) likely to be suspected of being in the country illegally rather than person with the last name of Smith. Because Smith has a very typically â€Å"American” last name, he, most likely, wouldn’t be asked to prove citizenship. This is a perfect example of the human body of profiling that Arizonians are concerned about.\r\nNot lone(prenominal) have law makers been creating laws encouraging racial profiling, but laws much(prenominal) as the â€Å" tin your Ground” law in Florida are allowing for racial profiling to occur at a lower repose a pseudonym. The â€Å"Stand your Ground” law allows for someone to use deadly force, if needed, in order to nurture themselves from harm’s way. The new slayings of teenagers Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis, two African American teenagers, have so far been defended under the law, leaveing uproar to the stateâ€especially among the glowering community. Even worse, it’s considered legal. Families and friends of these children defend them as being upstanding citizens killed due to their race. Although Martin and Davis have not been the tho preferably a little shooted under the law, they are the ones bring publicity to it. Due to the media attention, the policy’s exit on different racial groups is finally being questioned.\r\nJohn roman type, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute’s justice indemnity Center, conducted a study intending to measure the racial bias within the policy. Roman focused his study on killings that were considered confirm within the eyes of the court: the murder of tribe that just committed a felony. â€Å"Roman found that the killings of dark mass by dust coats were more than likely to be considered justified than the killings of white people by blacks…. In non-Stand Your Ground states, whites are 250 part more likely to be found justified in killing a black person than a white person who kills an different white person; in Stand Your Ground states, that material body jumps to 354 pct.” (Childress). Roman’s findings show that even laws that weren’t aimed to become a racial issue are. The issue, however, is that it’s not being stopped despite the blatantly obvious ramifications.\r\nSome might argue that people of color are being convicted for more crimes th an other races because they’re the ones committing more crimes. A valid point, however, with the recent advancement of these races throughout society, it would be thought that these meter would be heading in opposite directions. In reality, minorities are being served harsher consequences than their white counterparts despite their partake standing in society. Michigan State University (MSU) conducted a study revealing that at that place was often racial bias when selecting a juryâ€especially those involving minority parties. The study conducted by MSU examined jury selection as well as the decisions made by utter juries. â€Å"The MSU study of capital charging and sentencing found that those who kill whites are more likely to get the expiration penalisation than those who kill blacks. The MSU study found that a defendant is 2.6 times more likely to get the death penalty if the victim is white.” (ACLU).\r\nFollowing the study, North Carolina passed a law ent itled the â€Å"Racial Justice effect”. This piece of legislature made it possible for inmates to appeal their condemnations due to supposed racial profiling. Since the passing of the law last year, there have been 4 successful appeals. The law doesn’t guarantee that the whole sentence will be reversed; however, it puts in place a system that allows for flaws in the length/ scratchiness of the sentence to be readdressed. The passing of the law as well as the MSU study prove that although there are more minorities being charged for crimes, the charges are of ill-willed intentions. In addition to undeserved charges, DNA examination has exonerated hundreds of people for crimes in which they were convicted over the noncurrent few years. When DNA testing became readily addressable to the criminal justice system, crucial flaws began to surface.\r\nIt was realized that people were serving hard-time for felony crimes they didn’t commit. University of Virginia Law pro fessor, Brandon Garrett, studied the rootage 200 people exonerated through utter DNA testing. He compared the demographics of the exonerees concluding that â€Å"[Of] the innocent group, all male save one…71 percent were minorities. The vast majority of exonerated rape convicts (73 percent) were black or Hispanic, while studies show only about 37 percent of rape convicts are minorities.” (Wood). These hundreds of people are provide valid evidence supporting that, although people of color are being convicted of more crimes, they are also being cleared of say crimes.\r\nRacial ethnicity plays a large factor when it comes to being convicted of a crime. Oftentimes, a person of color is mechanically assumed to be more likely of committing a crime than a Caucasian person. People of minority races are being targeted as criminals purely based on their looks rather than their guilt. Laws have been passed both for and against say issue, providing for a government that is faci litating racism. Racial profiling isn’t an act that would be thought of as happening in the 21st century, following the Civil Rights course of the mid 1900’s. Despite the advancements in society, America’s criminal justice system hasn’t quite advanced so far.\r\nWorks Cited\r\nArchibold, Randal. â€Å"Arizona Enacts wet Law on Immigration”\r\nNYtimes.com April 23, 2012. Web. New York generation\r\nJanuary 30, 2013.\r\nChildress, Sarah. â€Å"Is There Racial Bias in ‘Stand your Ground’ Law?”\r\nPBS.org, July 31, 2012. Web. UNC-TV\r\nJanuary 30, 2013\r\nACLU. â€Å"North Carolina Racial Justice Act”\r\nACLU.org, December 17, 2012. Web. American Civil Liberties concretion\r\nJanuary 30, 2013\r\nWood, Mary. â€Å"Study of First 200 DNA Exonerations Shows damage Criminal System” law.virginia.edu, July 23, 2007.\r\nWeb. University of Virginia\r\nFebruary 2, 2013\r\n'