Anatomy of Criticism Essay -- Anatomy of Criticism Essays

Anatomy of check Introduction In his Anatomy of Criticism, Northrop Frye offers a complex theory that aspires to describe a unifying system for literary blame. It can be argued, however, that in attempting to delineate such(prenominal) an all-inclusive structure, Fryes system eliminates indistinguishability operator in literature. The present essay takes up this argument and offers examples of how identity is precluded by Fryes system as outlined in Anatomy of Criticism. Structure Vs. Identity In Fryes system, the organizing principles that give literature coherency and structure are derived from the myths of ancient Greece and the archetypal imaging found in the Bible. In his Third Essay, Frye suggests that all literature is based on burn downments of these myths. In postulating this, however, Frye denies the individual identity of a work of literature it becomes merely other abstraction of an axial symbol, an embellished copy of an archetypal myth. This tenet essentially annexes the identity of the writer as well, for every work of literature is seen by Frye as being based on or derived from all other works. The originality of a writers ideas is denied, and the authors identity is therefore negated. There is no such thing as an original literary identity in Fryes system. For Frye, literature must lead fundament to the Garden, to mythical symbolism if a literary work does not displace an archetype, then it is not considered to be literature. Although it seems that Frye is able to find axial imagery in almost any work, we must ask what his theory of myths excludes. If we odor at the works cited in the Anatomy, we see that Frye concentrates much of his discussion on the classics of Western literature (Shakespeare, Chaucer, Milton, T.S. ... ...y in this quote by removing the individual from the interrogative mood the immediacy of Who am I? is replaced with the more disinterested and impersonal Where is here(predicate)? But the questioning of identi ty is central to the Canadian imagination, and is perhaps an adage of our identity. In decontextualizing and desocializing literature, Frye denies the Canadian literary identity. Conclusion Northrop Fryes theory of literary criticism attempts to include all literature in a structure that totalizes. In doing so, however, identity is excluded the identity of the writer, the reader, and individual works ofliterature is denied in denying these identities, Frye perhaps precludes the identity of literature itself. List of References Used Frye, Northrop (19 ). The Bush Garden. Works CitedFrye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism Four Essays. Princeton Princeton UP, 1957.