Essay --

1. Descartes takes upon the travail of finding what beliefs he holds are certain and in order to do this he partakes in the method of doubt. This is the method of doubt reject e very belief which you crapper find reason to doubt (Ginsborg Lecture 1/19). However, he finds the task of attacking every single belief that he holds to be in whatever case difficult, so he looks at the foundations for his beliefs. This will cause the beliefs built upon those foundations to withal fall apart (AT 19). Throughout the first meditation Descartes goes through deeper stages of doubt, which leads him last to his supposition of the evil genius. The first foundation that Descartes breaks down is the belief of what his senses demonstrate him approximately very small and distant things (AT 19). He notices how his senses have deceived him about these things and, therefore, attacks the beliefs he has about very small and distant things. Because the foundation of beliefs concerning very small and distant things is stained, all the beliefs that were implicated from it can no interminable be believed. Upon breaking down this first foundation, Descartes finds that he can sedate come to believe certain things that his senses tell him, like sitting bordering to a fire and holding a paper (AT 19). Therefore, Descartes considers that he whitethorn be envisage, which makes these beliefs doubtful. Descartes argues that it is possible that he may be asleep and dreaming because there have been times in which he dreamt of mundane things such(prenominal) as sitting next to a fire. He cannot distinguish creation awake and asleep. Dreaming has deceived him it has made him think that he has been doing something other than actually sleeping (AT 29). Due to dream skepticism, the foundation of beliefs gained through his s... ...ed into. In essence, Descartes is a programmed computer that is being controlled, and seemingly has handsome will over his thoughts, solely really does not. His future thoughts have already been assigned and his past and real thoughts were assigned.This idea of thoughts being instilled within him also indicates a second flaw in Descartes argument, in that he assumes he has free will in his thinking. The God in this scenario instills every aspect of thinking, such as to doubt, understand, affirm..., and so forth within Descartes. He cannot be certain that he has any control over the thoughts within his mind because he may not actually even have the ability to think. Thinking is not sack on, but thoughts are inputted. Thus, having argued that he cannot assume that his thoughts belong to him and that he has free will, Descartes cannot be certain of his own existence.