Critique of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Essay Example for Free

Critique of the Universal Declaration of tender Rights EssayThe Universal Declaration of Human Rights, came as a reaction to the dreadful damages of the Second World War. This declaration was built check to the fundamentals of equality. It lists us all of our advanceds, all of our freedoms and how we can express them freely. It was constructed on the basic fact of it organismness just, equal to all, and right. However, are all articles applicable on all of mankind? Or can some of these be questi one(a)d? Generally, all of these articles should be applicable for the majority of humans, hardly not all of them. There is evermore an exception to the rule.There is always an outlier that doesnt follow the rules. Many countries have rejected or not signed this declaration, therefore this declaration isnt pertinent everywhere. One can find a bay window of exceptions for many articles. Article 1 states that all human beings are free and equal in self-worth and rights, that they are endowed with reason and conscience and should act toward one another in a aspect of impart. Nonetheless, not all human beings are reasonable and conscious of everything they do. Take serial killers for example. Their acts prove of inhumaneity. A man with reason and/or conscience would never do much(prenominal) a thing.Also, should we give overweening people the same rights as the ones reasonable people have? Should they have the same privilege as others even if they have no sense of reason or conscience? The United Nations General aggregation also mentioned the fact that people should act in a spirit of brotherhood. Look around you, what brotherhood? Is killing each other brotherhood? Is fighting and starting wars brotherhood? Is forgetting every moral and pay off way of acting just to get to power brotherhood? A definite no is the make better answer to these questions. There are no signs of brotherhood around us.On the contrary, if one takes a stopping point look to o ur surroundings and everything around us, humans, one will only notice nothing but signs of disputation and opposition. Article 2 raises the issue of the fact that were all equal in terms of rights and freedoms without specialization of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, ancestry or other status. Despite that, distinctions according to race, color, sex, religion, etc still exist in our modern society. Movements of racism, sexism, and religions distinctions still exist, but of course, lesser than before.People are still fighting and battling to erase these distinctions completely. This is a process every soul looking for an equal and just world should follow. Article 5 states that no one shall be subjected to straining or to be cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. What about those who commit inhuman acts, those who torture other humans for the fun of it, dont they deserve to hav e a try of their own medicine? One should be treated the way one treats others. So if one tortures one another, that one shall be tortured or punished. Part 2 of article 15 articulates the fact that no one shall be deprived of his nationality.Well, what if that individual was involved in acts of high treason? What if that person false his back on his country and denied his own nationality. That person definitely does not deserve to hold his nationality and shall be deprived from it immediately. Articles 18 and 19 talk about the fact that everyone is free to express their thoughts, opinions, religions. Some thoughts and opinions competency actually harm others. Physically or mentally. In that way, it will refrain article 1. An example of such opinions/thoughts/religion would be Satanism and the Ku Klux Klan. These associations actions can damage others and hurt them.Therefore, these associations do not have the right to fully express themselves, but partially. They can only expres s the opinions/thoughts that do no harm to others. To sum things up, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is inconsistent its articles are not always suitable. This declaration is not structural in all countries as some countries did not sign it. This declaration fails in its goal of it being universal Exceptions can be found to some articles. Pieces of this declaration can be questioned for some hairsplitting individuals. It is not always applicable and it is not always a reliable document.